Editorial policy
Evidence before confidence
The editorial system is designed to make the source, scope, review state, and remaining uncertainty easier to inspect than a confident-sounding summary.
Source standard
Official regulators, credential and examination bodies, and government authorities are the factual basis for licensing and immigration requirements. Every material requirement should be traceable to the responsible source and a visible verification date.
Claim standard
- No eligibility, visa, registration, employment, or timing guarantee.
- No fee without currency, effective date, scope, and official citation.
- No duration without a clear basis and uncertainty label.
- No national rule substituted for a state, province, or territory rule.
- No hidden upgrade from source review to expert review.
Corrections and source changes
Source monitoring can flag a page as changed, unchanged, or unavailable. A flag does not update a pathway automatically. The affected record must be checked against the official page, dated again, and returned through source and editorial review. A stale or uncertain claim should be marked for review rather than silently retained.
A public corrections contact is not yet available. A working correction channel, with an accountable named editor behind it, is a requirement this project still has to meet.
Independence and commercial content
No affiliate placement is active anywhere on this site. If commercial content ever appears, it must be visibly labelled, it must not influence pathway requirements, and it must not imply regulator endorsement. Automated text generation never bypasses source checking, editorial review, or required expert review.